SALT LAKE CITY – A case before the Utah Supreme Court could challenge how armed, off-duty police officers could respond to life-threatening situations.
Bullets whizzed over the head of a former Unified Police detective three years ago during a hunting trip.
“He went to assess the threat, responding how he had been trained by carrying—behind his back—his firearm,” said Paul Cassell, the attorney for Lance Bess.
“[Bess] ended up being criminally charged for that.”
Cassell, who is also a law professor at the University of Utah, says Lance Bess never pointed his gun at the errant hunters.
But Bess did unholster it, and he did curse them out. Bess spent two days in jail.
Cassell says the conviction, if it stands, will limit abilities of off-duty, armed officers to respond in possibly deadly situations.
Cassell will argue for a new trial before Utah’s Supreme Court.
“We need to remember how important these off-duty officers are when they respond to threats,” Cassell said. “I think we should give them the benefit of the doubt.”
Bess quit the force and now has a civilian job with UPD.
The state Attorney General’s Office won’t comment while it prosecutes the appeal.
Today’s Top Stories
- Silver Island: a desert escape well worth a visit
- Special delivery: Over 500,000 protective face masks transported to Salt Lake International Airport
- Utah drivers licenses one step closer to going digital
- Pandemic pause ends in Susan Powell parents lawsuit trial
- 4 tips for getting a COVID-19 vaccine appointment booked sooner in Utah
- All Utah 24 Hour Fitness locations to close, customers transferred to VASA
- Santa, reindeer granted permit to enter US on Christmas Eve
- What to do if you encounter a dangerous animal in the wild
- New wildlife bridge comes with cameras, warnings
- Lagoon ready to open without reservations